Home
Sign up for E-update

 
Recent Debate
RE-USE IT OR LOSE IT: Prentice and Chicago's Modernist Architecture
 
PARTICIPANTS AND TOPICS

 

What does the success of the preservation movement tell us about ourselves?
Robert Bruegmann, Professor of Art History, Architecture,
and Urban Planning, University of Illinois - Chicago
[read bio]


 

Is landmarking a legal thing?
Jack Guthman, attorney, Shefsky & Froelich [read bio]


 

Are modernist structures significant enough to save?
Jim Peters, President, Landmarks Illinois [read bio]


 

Mary Brush, Preservation Specialist [read bio]


 

Edward Lifson (moderator)
Cultural Critic and blogger

[read bio]

 

Prentice Hospital

June 14th, Dick's Last Resort

Over the recent years Chicagoans in both the public and private sectors have been engaged with passionate dialogue regarding the worth – and fate – of buildings designed by master modernist architects.  Walter Gropius’ Michael Reese Hospital being torn down for the Olympic Village.  Mies van der Rohe’s Test Cell being torn down for a Metra Station.  Bertrand Goldberg’s Prentice Women’s Hospital torn down for a new research facility?  

Some say these buildings are worth saving and showcase our cultural heritage for generations to come.  Reuse it!
Others say these buildings are ugly, outdated, and insignificant.  Lose it!

In a city defined by its architecture, it is said that even taxi drivers know the difference between a Bertrand Goldberg and a Mies van der Rohe.  Many people however find it difficult to warm up to the aesthetics of a modernist buildings, with their materials of concrete, glass and steel, their form, and their seeming lack of applied ornamentation.  Did we ever care about these buildings before preservationists brought them to our attention?  In the name of progress, what does a property owner do when a building outlives its original purpose? 

Are these the “Louis Sullivan’s” of our generation?  Will we regret tearing these down?  Or will we be stuck with buildings that can no longer serve a function?  This is a timeless topic and one that will be asked for generations to come.  
 
Chicago Debates are lively, passionate, no-holds-barred, real, thoughtful, solution-oriented conversations with audience participation. We'll take your questions during the event, and you can also follow on Twitter #ChicagoDebates.  The voting - and commenting - continues on this web site before and after the debate.  It's your forum.
If you care about our city, be a part of the debate.  If you care about the quality of life here, be a part of the debate.  Chicago Debates.

INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE?

Read an article in Architect about the battle over Prentice Women's Hospital.
Read "When is a Landmark a Landmark?" in the Huffington Post to see how this same issue is playing out in New York.
Read "Architecture’s Ugly Ducklings May Not Get Time to Be Swans" in The New York Times 4/7/12 .

Did you miss the debate? Listen to the full podcast of "Re-Use It or Lose It: Prentice and Chicago's Modernist Architecture."

 

RE-USE IT OR LOSE IT
Prentice and Chicago's Modernist Architecture


Watch the video!

 


Scenes from the June 14 Chicago Debate

 

[Slideshow image]

RECENT DEBATE


Watch the video!

Featured topics included:

Importance of Good Design 
Future of Bus Travel
Future of Train Travel
Big Ideas, Small Budget

Chicago Public Transit: On Track or Derailed?

April 12

If you’ve been to Europe, Asia, or even Portland, Oregon, you might return home to Chicago and wonder about our public transportation system. Is this really the best we can do? Why does improvement come so slowly? Heck, why do the buses come so slowly? Some say public transit in Chicago is good enough. On track! Others say it’s as stuck as a broken-down bus. Derailed! The conversation continues after the debate...Discuss here!

If you missed the debate, watch a video of the highlights.

Panelists:

Aaron Renn
Urban affairs analyst and blogger

Lee Bey
Executive Director, Chicago Central Area Committee; and blogger

Christopher Robling
Principal, Jayne Thompson & Associates

Stephen Schlickman
Executive Director, Urban Transportation Center, University of Illinois at Chicago

Mary Wisniewski
Reporter, Reuters

Edward Lifson
Cultural Critic and blogger (moderator)

 

 
     
       

   This project is also generously supported by the AIA Chicago Foundation.



Need help or have a question about a program? Call the help line at 312-922-8687.

Chicago Architecture Foundation, 224 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60604    312.922.3432     © Copyright 2012